The vanlife movement has awoken a new generation of聽American road-trippers鈥攎yself included. The Instagram hashtag #vanlife has been tagged over 4.77 million times. As a lifestyle, it offers a new vision of the American dream, and it鈥檚 one that allows me to live in nature. But聽as it turns out, this lifestyle is not necessarily better for nature.
Two years ago I moved into a vehicle to escape the hustle of humanity and concrete that enmeshes the Washington, D.C., area, where I worked as a full-time writer for NASA.聽I鈥檓 now a freelance writer and photographer, spending the seasons following the sun like a migratory bird, often amid a flock of like-minded individuals living in trucks, vans, and cars.
The more I roam, the more I鈥檝e begun to question the impact of my lifestyle. With a footprint of 24 square feet鈥攁 bit smaller than a full-size聽bed鈥攖he 2006 Honda Element I call home is one-hundredth the size of the average American household and far smaller than any聽tiny house. A聽modest聽house typically takes less energy to heat than a traditional house, which is often the largest contributor to a carbon footprint. But in the case of my mobile tiny home, the gas it uses to deliver me to far-flung places makes my carbon footprint disproportionately larger than my physical one. Every time I fill up the tank, I wonder:聽Am I harming the places I love to live more so than I did when I was living in a house?
I sat down with a pen, paper, and a calculator. Driving, which constitutes , was clearly going to be the largest contributor to my emissions, so I started there. Since every five聽miles per hour driven above 60 miles per hour聽, I鈥檝e adopted a tortoise-paced driving style. I eke out an average 25 miles to the gallon, but I cruise some 12,500 miles in a year, just less than the average American鈥. Annually, this deposits around 10,000 pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Beyond gas, I also contribute 33 pounds of carbon dioxide a year from doing laundry.
Adding in my relatively sustainable vegetarian diet, which according to a聽, adds in around 3,100 pounds of carbon dioxide from growing and transporting food, plus 36 pounds of carbon dioxide for cooking fuel, my total emissions tip the scales at 6.6 U.S. tons of carbon dioxide, considerably above the global average of聽5.5 tons.
We would聽need more than two earths to sustain us if everyone lived like me, according to the聽. Hardly what you鈥檇 call sustainable.
Before setting off on the road, I lived in the suburbs of D.C., sharing a house with two friends. We strove to live conscientiously鈥攃omposting, recycling, turning down the heat, and bike commuting. Looking back on our electricity bills and the miles I drove then, I calculated my carbon emissions for that lifestyle at 5.6 tons of carbon dioxide. Including other things a house requires, namely sewage and waste disposal, add in around an additional 1,100 pounds of carbon dioxide annually. By living in a vehicle, I am actually doing worse by the environment鈥攍iterally a ton worse.
At the same time, my circumstances of the way I lived in a traditional house and the vehicle I drive aren鈥檛 typical. According to 聽conducted by the World Bank, the average American goes through 18 tons of carbon dioxide per year鈥攎uch larger than my own house footprint鈥攁nd, similarly, many vanlifers drive homes with compatible or worse fuel economies than my Honda Element. In fact,聽a Sprinter van鈥攖he oft-desired luxury liner of vans鈥攚ould create 40 percent more emissions over the same miles compared to my own bright-red box on wheels, given the Sprinter vans聽lower mileage and use of diesel.
Skeptics will point out that since 1988 come聽from just 100 companies. Indeed, major industries are huge contributors to emissions, much more than any of us individually. At the same time, these industries exist to serve us. By reducing our own consumption, we reduce the need for these companies, and by holding these companies responsible, we can add pressure on them to invest in renewables.
I mulled over these numbers as I watched the sunrise from聽, amid聽the Santa Catalina range in southern Arizona. The air was crisp, and a multitude of twinkling lights far below in Tucson winked out just after the stars as the morning gained momentum. Soon聽dozens of vehicles would be zipping by, taking families up the mountain for a Sunday picnic or hike.
I鈥檝e taken the first step in being聽conscientious of my impact, but the next step鈥攁ctually making changes鈥攚ill prove to be much harder. Since driving is 75 percent of my footprint, I鈥檒l focus on reducing my mileage by staying put longer and carefully planning out routes. I鈥檒l also commit to keeping a close eye on tire pressure and regular checkups, which can improve fuel economy. By聽eating locally, I can save driven. So from now on, look out for me living vanlife in the slow lane. In addition to joining the , which promotes local and traditional foods, I鈥檒l be pioneering a Slow Driving movement.