Rupert Murdoch has a story and he is sticking to it. On Monday,聽鈥檚 opinion page聽denied human responsibility for climate change, and Murdoch’s story continues.
takes an official stance against claims that President Obama and has published, saying that, 鈥淣inety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.鈥
The editorial was written by Joseph Bast, president of the 鈥淧R pollution clearing鈥 , and Roy Spencer. According to published Wednesday, Spencer formerly testified to US Congress in support of human-responsibility claims as part of the 97 percent, despite his research falling in the 3 percent peer-reviewed fringe minority work claiming the exact opposite.
Bast and Spencer argue that abstracts of the 97 percent鈥檚 studies don鈥檛 reflect the content accurately, that climate scientists don鈥檛 specifically claim global warming to be 鈥渄angerous,鈥 and that 鈥渟cores of articles by prominent [contrarian] scientists鈥 who question the consensus, were excluded.鈥
Within the sources that Bast and Spencer do cite is a from the , where only 13 percent of participant members describe climate science as their area of expertise.
According to The Guardian, the editorial could be credited as a response to , which has gone viral with over 3 million views. Either way, WSJ鈥檚 strident stance that climate change isn’t being impacted by human activity is prompting many to question their responsibility as a news leader.