国产吃瓜黑料

GET MORE WITH OUTSIDE+

Enjoy 35% off GOES, your essential outdoor guide

UPGRADE TODAY

If you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission. This supports our mission to get more people active and outside. Learn more

A black bear in Bubbs Creek, Sequoia-Kings National Park
A black bear in Bubbs Creek, Sequoia-Kings National Park (Photo: Andrew Skurka)

How to Protect Food from Bears

Food is heavy. Don't carry it for miles while backpacking just to let something else eat it.

Published: 
A black bear in Bubbs Creek, Sequoia-Kings National Park
(Photo: Andrew Skurka)

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

You鈥檝e set up camp for the night and cooked dinner. Now what should be done to protect the Snickers, salami, , and the other calories that will sustain you for the remainder of your backpacking trip?

Protect It from What?

Most backpackers seem to protect their food overnight because they鈥檙e worried about bears. In places like the High Sierra, that concern is entirely warranted.

But proper food storage is important in other locations, too, even if the bear population is low or nonexistent聽and even if there are few or no reports of bears obtaining human food.

Why? Because of mini bears鈥攖he mice, rats, squirrels, rabbits, marmots, pikas, raccoons, porcupines, gray jays, and other small animals that reside in popular front-country and backcountry campsites. Mini bears may not run off with your entire food bag or give you nightmares, but they definitely can ruin a few chocolate bars, sometimes after first chewing a hole in your shelter, backpack pockets, and food bag.

In areas where canisters are not required and where I鈥檓 not concerned about bears or mini bears, I will sleep on or next to my food. This Wind River Range campsite was several miles off-trail, at tree line, and showed no signs of previous use. My food sack is the see-through bag to the left of the blue stuffsack. I often will use it as a pillow or knee rest.
In areas where canisters are not required and where I鈥檓 not concerned about bears or mini bears, I will sleep on or next to my food. This Wind River Range campsite was several miles off-trail, at tree line, and showed no signs of previous use. My food sack is the see-through bag to the left of the blue stuffsack. I often will use it as a pillow or knee rest. (Andrew Skurka)

Protect What?

Anything that is supposed to go in you or on you should be properly stored overnight. That obviously includes food聽but also lip balm, sunscreen, toothpaste, etc. The thinking here is that wildlife may not discern between cherry-flavored lipstick and a bag of Craisins.

I don鈥檛 protect my stove and pot, which I clean thoroughly after dinner. While they may have some residual food smell, most of my other gear does, too, and this isn鈥檛 the threshold for what should or should not be protected overnight.

How to Protect Your Food Overnight

I rely on and recommend five things and techniques to protect food overnight in the backcountry, all of which are elaborated on later in this post:

  1. Permanent infrastructure
  2. Hard-sided canisters
  3. Soft-sided sacks
  4. Rodent hangs
  5. Sleeping with it

The exact method I use is determined or informed by local regulations, personal familiarity, local guidebooks, online forums, trip reports, and informal conversations with rangers.

Video: Overnight Food Protection

I鈥檓 no longer with Sierra Designs, but this video nicely summarizes my recommended methods.

In-Depth: Food-Storage Pros and聽Cons聽and Best Practices

1. Permanent infrastructure

High-use areas and campsites may have permanent food-protection infrastructure. For example, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks have聽installed large bear boxes in . Elsewhere聽I have seen cable, pole, and cross-beam systems.

If this type of infrastructure is available, I use it. It鈥檚 effective, convenient, free, and weightless鈥攁nd it was probably installed for good reason.

A permanent bear box (lower left) at a high-use campsite on the John Muir Trail
A permanent bear box (lower left) at a high-use campsite on the John Muir Trail (Andrew Skurka)

2. Hard-sided canisters

An increasing number of land agencies require that backpackers carry ; you鈥檒l find this the case聽in the Adirondack High Peaks and in national parks including Canyonlands, Olympic,聽Rocky Mountain, Sequoia and Kings, Yosemite, and more.

When canisters are required, I carry one. I use the 聽($69) or BV500 ($79), because they offer the best volume-to-weight ratio and because I鈥檓 too frugal to spend more than $300聽on a carbon-fiber Bearikade.

Where hard-sided canisters are required, I carry one. My personal pick is the BearVault (lower-right corner), which has the best volume-to-weight ratio among economically priced models.
Where hard-sided canisters are required, I carry one. My personal pick is the BearVault (lower-right corner), which has the best volume-to-weight ratio among economically priced models. (Andrew Skurka)

3. Soft-sided animal-resistant sacks

Hard-sided canisters are effective (well, mostly鈥) and they keep me compliant with local regulations, but of course I don鈥檛 like to carry them鈥攖hey鈥檙e heavy and don鈥檛 pack well.

I would rather carry a , which is ideal for an area where bears and/or mini bears are a potential problem and hard-sided canisters are not required.

You might think of these products as inexpensive and lightweight insurance. Two companies serve this niche: Armored Outdoor, which makes the Ratsack, and Ursack, which has rodent- and bear-resistant sacks.

  • 罢丑别听 ($65, 5 oz),聽for mini bears only.
  • 罢丑别听 ($80, 8 oz), which has been certified by the Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee.聽and is suitable for bears only.
  • 罢丑别听 ($125, 13 oz), which聽both rodent- and bear-resistant.
The BV500 (left) and Ursack Major (right) are both about 650 cubic inches in volume. But the Ursak is 60 percent lighter and is soft sided. Which would you rather carry?
The BV500 (left) and Ursack Major (right) are both about 650 cubic inches in volume. But the Ursak is 60 percent lighter and is soft sided. Which would you rather carry? (Andrew Skurka)

4. Rodent hangs

As a substitute for a Ratsack or an Ursack Minor, food can successfully be protected from rodents by hanging it. Keep it a few feet off the ground, a few feet from the trunk, and below the limb聽of whatever tree you鈥檙e hanging it from.

This is not a bear hang. An adult should be able to hang it and take it down without throwing a rope or standing on someone鈥檚 shoulders, and it can be set up a few feet from your shelter. To suspend it, use the drawstring on the food sack鈥攐r聽better yet, add a length of heavy-duty fishing line, which rodents can鈥檛 climb.

At this established camp at the foot of the Dinwoody Glacier, I should have known that rodents could be an issue and either hung my food or used a rodent-resistant sack. Instead, one chewed a small hole in my Opsak food bag.
At this established camp at the foot of the Dinwoody Glacier, I should have known that rodents could be an issue and either hung my food or used a rodent-resistant sack. Instead, one chewed a small hole in my Opsak food bag. (Andrew Skurka)

5. Sleeping with it

If I鈥檓 not required to store my food in a hard-sided canister, and if I鈥檓 not concerned about bears or mini bears, I will sleep on my food. I think I can get away with this because of where I backpack and camp鈥攊n big wilderness areas and at low- or no-use campsites. Don鈥檛 try this at a Yosemite Valley campground, a designated backcountry site in Rocky Mountain National Park, or an established camp on the Appalachian Trail.

A food sack makes a decent pillow, though I prefer a pneumatic model like the 聽($25, 2 oz). As a back sleeper, I prefer to put it under my knees, because it helps reduce pressure on my back.

To store my food, I use 12-by-20-inch 聽(from $10). These bags are odor proof, at least when new鈥攚ithin a few days, I bet the exterior smells like food. I still like them, though: they鈥檙e tough and see-through.

Discouraged: Bear Hangs

You may have noticed that the classic bear hang does not make my list of recommended protection techniques. I discourage bear hangs of any variety, including the counterbalance and PCT method. I may elaborate on this in a future post, but in general I find them to be:

  • Time-consuming, frustrating, and dangerous.
  • Infeasible where trees are spindly, short, or nonexistent.
  • Largely ineffective against a determined bear.

I think a bear hang聽is聽an聽old-school technique聽that is taught by some programs as if it鈥檚 still 1970. If聽you鈥檙e really serious about protecting your food from bears, use one of the first three methods I described in this post.

Completely ineffective: a typical bear hang on the Aspen Four Pass Loop
Completely ineffective: a typical bear hang on the Aspen Four Pass Loop (Andrew Skurka)
Lead Photo: Andrew Skurka

Popular on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online