国产吃瓜黑料

GET MORE WITH OUTSIDE+

Enjoy 35% off GOES, your essential outdoor guide

UPGRADE TODAY

Some states have passed or are considering bills that demand the federal government relinquish its claim to national forests and Bureau of Land Management parcels and transfer them to state control.
Some states have passed or are considering bills that demand the federal government relinquish its claim to national forests and Bureau of Land Management parcels and transfer them to state control. (Photo: Tony Brooks/Flickr)

In the Fight for Public Lands, the Outdoor Industry Is a Rising Force

From major manufacturers to local outfitters, the outdoor industry is coming into its own as a political force. Public lands, and all who love them, stand to benefit in a big way.

Published: 
Some states have passed or are considering bills that demand the federal government relinquish its claim to national forests and Bureau of Land Management parcels and transfer them to state control.
(Photo: Tony Brooks/Flickr)

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

On January 22, at the Outdoor Retailer Market in Salt Lake City, former interior secretary Bruce Babbitt told a roomful of recreation entrepreneurs, backcountry outfitters, and gear manufacturers to wake up.

鈥淚 would argue that your industry鈥攖he $646 billion per year outdoor recreation industry鈥攊s a sleeping giant,鈥 he said. 鈥淚f you mobilize the full economic and political power of your industry, you can change the debate.鈥 The persistent, high-stakes debate about public lands, that is.

Babbitt鈥檚 remarks were a vigorous reminder that a variety of forces, from congressional budget cutters to Cliven Bundy鈥檚 homespun militia, are threatening the legal and financial underpinnings that prevent聽our nation鈥檚 public lands from succumbing to private interest agendas. These lands power the outdoor economy, but millions of federally protected acres in the West are currently under attack by what is commonly referred to as the land transfer movement.

Lawmakers in Utah, Nevada, Wyoming, and other states have passed or are considering bills that demand the federal government relinquish its claim to national forests and Bureau of Land Management parcels and transfer them to state control. If these campaigns succeed, there鈥檚 a good chance the states wouldn鈥檛 be able to bear the costs of managing their new holdings and would be forced to sell them off to extractive industries and developers. Lawmakers in Utah, who are leading this fight, have threatened to sue the federal government if it does not comply.聽

鈥淭his is the moment,鈥 Babbitt told his audience, 鈥渢o apply the strength of your industry to the defense of America鈥檚 public lands.鈥

U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, left, exemplifies the growth in power of the outdoor industry. She formerly served as CEO of REI.
U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, left, exemplifies the growth in power of the outdoor industry. She formerly served as CEO of REI. (Governor Kate Brown/)

There was a time not so long ago, during the Clinton administration and the early years of George W. Bush, when the outdoor industry wasn鈥檛 a giant at all. It didn鈥檛 have the strength to respond to this kind of challenge. It was young and inexperienced in the corridors of power. 鈥淲e would go into DC,聽and we would be dismissed,鈥 says Frank Hugelmeyer, former CEO of the (OIA). 鈥淲e鈥檇 joke that we were meeting with the intern鈥檚 intern.鈥

But the industry has come a long way in the past two decades. It has emerged as an employer of 6.1 million Americans, according to the OIA, and has one of its own, former REI CEO Sally Jewell, at the helm of the Interior Department. Outdoor companies and their employees are flexing their political muscles in novel and creative ways all across the country. From outspoken CEOs like Black Diamond鈥檚 Peter Metcalf to local advocacy by smaller outdoor businesses, the industry鈥檚 unique voice is growing louder and getting bolder day by day. For the public lands and the people who love them, that鈥檚 a very good thing.

In the days before April 15, a group of 55 executives from companies like REI, SmartWool, Patagonia, and more boarded planes bound for Washington, DC,聽to attend the OIA鈥檚 annual . As the outdoor economy鈥檚 flagship trade group, the OIA calls on its membership to spend a few frenzied days each year bending ears and pushing the industry鈥檚 broad and growing agenda on Capitol Hill. With congressmen, senators, and other bigwigs on hand, it鈥檚 a good opportunity to plug the public lands.

This year, the group lobbied Congress to fully support the Land and Water Conservation Fund, a crucial pool of money drawn from offshore oil royalties and distributed among government agencies to develop outdoor recreation infrastructure across the country. It鈥檚 what builds those fishing access sites on the side of the road, those bike trails through town, and the campsites in your favorite parks. Congress has consistently raided the fund ; only twice in 50 years has it received its full $900 million allotment, and this year it鈥檚 up for reauthorization. The OIA鈥檚 message to lawmakers was simple: Failing to fully reauthorize the fund will hurt the communities and companies that count on trails, parks, and public access to generate business.

The gathered OIA board also took time to address the threat on everybody鈥檚 mind. For the first time, it officially voted to support OIA staffers who want to go after the land transfer movement at the local, state, and federal levels. The OIA in Congress, according to OIA government affairs director Alex Boian. It may also develop a network of outdoor businesses to help quash land transfer efforts in the states. Many of the organization鈥檚 supporters say the move couldn鈥檛 have come soon enough.

鈥淚 think that certainly we as an industry did not stand up soon enough on this state land-grab idea,鈥 says Metcalf, who attended the Capitol Summit. 鈥淲e need to move in a unified strident voice to say that this is a horrific idea, this is radical, it is dumb, and if it goes forward, it will be one of the worst things that has ever happened to our industry.鈥

The OIA鈥檚 message to lawmakers was simple: Failing to fully reauthorize the fund will hurt the communities and companies that count on trails, parks, and public access to generate business.

The OIA is not alone in its effort to harness the outdoor industry鈥檚 economic might and help it realize its full political potential and protect its interests. A slate of other independent projects is doing the hard work as well. The most notable, perhaps, is the 肠补尘辫补颈驳苍.听

The Center for American Progress and other groups launched Count My Job in January to persuade the federal government, and the Department of Commerce in particular, to start collecting comprehensive economic data on the outdoor industry. Federal agencies do that for industries like mining and timber, but it hasn鈥檛 happened for outdoor business, and that鈥檚 a problem. Right now, policymakers and legislators can鈥檛 find big-picture government numbers on the industry鈥檚 contribution鈥攊n jobs and dollars鈥攖o national, state, and local economies.聽That lack of official data makes it more difficult to push for things like new land acquisitions, a beefed-up Interior Department budget, or more trail crews in the national forests.聽

Being counted is crucial. Babbitt stressed the issue in his January speech, and the OIA is behind it. What鈥檚 more, the campaign is seeing success. Several聽senators are already calling on the executive branch聽to . On April 16, Count My Job 聽that featured a very supportive Jewell, who offered this folksy advice to outdoor advocates:

鈥淚f you are not at the table, you are on the menu, and I think about that a lot,鈥 said Jewell, speaking of the need for better government data and more industry input on policy. 鈥淏ecause if we value public lands and they are important to our businesses and they are important to the things we care about, then we have got to be at the table.鈥

Supermoon at Turret Arch, Arches National Park.
Supermoon at Turret Arch, Arches National Park. (Jacob W. Frank/NPS )

Of course, there鈥檚 more to the world than Washington, DC.聽Industry leaders are also looking to the local level to turn their values and dollars into action. In her speech to the Count My Job crowd, Jewell singled out a pioneering example of local advocacy done right. It鈥檚 called the Moab Master Leasing Plan, a Bureau of Land Management attempt to balance competing interests on more than 900,000 acres of public land around Utah鈥檚 Arches National Park. Outdoor businesses鈥攍ed by Ashley Korenblat, the hard-biking CEO of Moab鈥檚 Western Spirit Cycling鈥攈ave had a standout role shaping the plan.

鈥淪upporting the public lands has to become the mainstream agenda for everyone,鈥 says Korenblat, who is an OIA adviser and runs the nonprofit advocacy group . She believes the industry still relies too heavily on conservation groups to protect the public lands. 鈥淲e want to make it a business issue,鈥 she says. The BLM has taken notice of her work; its master plan is shaping up to keep Moab鈥檚 finest trails and recreation hot spots safe from oil and gas operators.

All these projects, and others like them, signal the same development: The outdoor industry is coming into its own as a political force. It is articulating the economic case for public land protection. It is building power. The giant is awake, but there is much more to do.

Filed to:
Lead Photo: Tony Brooks/Flickr

Popular on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online