Since 1950, when Warren Miller聽began traveling the U.S. with his amped-up ski footage, fall film tours have marked the arrival of winter for snow-sports lovers. Miller birthed a ski-porn industry that spawned over a dozen clones.
Warren Miller Entertainment had聽a film come聽out last fall, as usual鈥斺攂ut this year things feel different. Overall, the number of ski flicks is shrinking. Last September, Level 1 , the 20th and final installment of the company鈥檚 storied annual franchise. It joined a growing number of production houses that haven鈥檛 been able to sustain operations: Poor Boyz Productions stopped making feature-length shred films in 2015 and transitioned into commercial work. Smaller outfits like 聽and Powderwhore Productions have shuttered or moved away from the medium, too.
What happened? Since Miller鈥檚 day, ski-film producers would cultivate a crew of elite skiers, spend the season shooting their best lines and tricks, edit them into a porn reel, and then tour it around the country. Their films were the best way to see the most exciting skiing of the previous year, documenting the rise of everything from ski ballet to backcountry skiing. But the process started to change when we got cameras inside our phones and GoPros聽on our helmets.
Director Josh Berman started Level 1 two decades ago to showcase underground East Coast ski culture. But his recent films struggled to compete with social media and shorter attention spans. Jon Klaczkiewicz, head of production at , says viewers are increasingly impatient and unwilling to wait for movies to reach theaters, and it鈥檚 taking away some of the magic of watching powder shots together on a big screen. 鈥淏ack in the day, you鈥檇 work really hard, and then you wouldn鈥檛 share it until the community got together,鈥 he says. 鈥淪ocial media is taking out the process of discovery.鈥 Today when someone does a quad cork 1800, it can be streamed on Instagram in a flash.聽
Meanwhile, funding is聽slipping as brands that traditionally sponsor ski聽movies spend more on social media. 鈥淚t鈥檚 an increasing challenge to raise money for these films,鈥 Berman says. 鈥淭en years ago, a brand would give you $20,000 to put their logo in the credits. The conversation now is, Here鈥檚 $20,000, we鈥檙e going to need a team edit, a series of Instagram posts, and an e-mail grab. We鈥檙e stretching ourselves thin to make the same margins.鈥
To those who love seeing these movies in a theater full of other ski geeks, this shift feels like a loss. The scene is smaller, even though there are companies still putting out annual films, including Matchstick Productions, which released its 2019 offering, , last September. Berman agrees that watching clips on your phone isn鈥檛 the same as being in a venue with friends. 鈥淭here will never be a substitute for having people in a room experiencing the same thing,鈥 he says.