Seven top performers for pounding the pavement.

Hoka One One Mach ($140)
Since Hoka hit the running-shoe scene in 2009, not one of its lightweight megafoam constructions has managed to earn our Gear of the Year honors. This year the curse is broken. The superfast, midfat Mach was the top pick of about half our team, and it earned strong marks from everyone else鈥攁 rare instance of something approaching unanimity. Built atop a snappy midsole that鈥檚 firmly energetic but easy on the legs, the Mach is thick, quick, and easy to love. 鈥淭he responsiveness allowed me to get some energy back when I took these on a tempo run,鈥 a tester said. One downside: the thin upper has almost no padding. Another: the soft outsole wears fast and is a little slippery on wet pavement. While there鈥檚 enough cushion to take the sting out of heel strikes, the five-millimeter drop makes this best for those who favor the midfoot. At the risk of stating the obvious, the Mach is likely to please runners who prefer maximalist shoes, but with 24 millimeters of stack height, it isn鈥檛 so beefy that others won鈥檛 enjoy it. At long last, a Hoka that doesn鈥檛 polarize. 8.2 oz (men鈥檚) / 6.7 oz (women鈥檚); 5 mm drop
听

On Cloud X ($140)
Best crossover trainer
This funky, lightweight low-rider from Swiss upstart On is part cheetah, part gym rat. For purists, it delivered a surprisingly crisp ride on short and medium-length runs. The unusual mid- and outsole construction鈥攈ollow foam arches compress to absorb shock鈥攄elivers a fairly smooth transition. The attention to detail and quality of construction are impeccable. 鈥淭he shoe fit my foot extremely well,鈥 one tester said (and several others echoed). Cushion is limited, however, giving the Cloud X a harsher feel than other shoes we tried. It鈥檚 designed for efficient, light-landing midfoot strikers鈥攁nd, frankly, indoor use. Heel strikers and foam addicts should probably look elsewhere. 8.5 oz (men鈥檚) / 6.6 oz (women鈥檚); 6 mm drop
听

Mizuno Wave Shadow ($110)
Best for tempo runs
The Wave Shadow is something of a hybrid racing flat and trainer. The shoe is low to the ground, with a thin, moderately firm midsole and very quick turnover. Its greatest asset is the fit, which our team universally praised. But the Wave Shadow won鈥檛 pamper you. It鈥檚 made for efficiency and ground feel鈥攃haracteristics favored by lighter, speed-oriented runners鈥攁nd performed best on three-to-six-mile distances near the red zone, not long-range efforts, where the thin midsole could prove exhausting. Runners who like Mizuno鈥檚 firm, responsive ride will enjoy the snappy feel. But the more you weigh (or the harder you land), the more minimalist the shoe feels. 8.8 oz (men鈥檚) / 7.4 oz (women鈥檚); 8 mm drop
听

Nike Epic React Flyknit ($150)
Best for heel strikers
This shoe came close to earning our top honors for the season. It belongs to a rare class of trainer: both thick and speedy. In addition to an unusually snug and stretchy knit-mesh upper, the Epic React Flyknit is distinguished by its heel-strike-friendly geometry. Where the shoe surprised testers most was in its peppy ride, even with the foam鈥檚 generous softness. While the heel is plush and deep, the forefoot is responsive and low to the ground. That combination produces a comfortable, pampered ride with a poppy toe-off. If you鈥檙e a heel striker looking for a cushy feel but still want to keep pace with the rest of the pack, consider this your fatty. 8.4 oz (men鈥檚) / 6.9 oz (women鈥檚); 9 mm drop
听

Saucony Kinvara 9 ($110)
Best for speedy midfoot strikers
The Kinvara defies categorization. As a trainer, it鈥檚 ridiculously light鈥攋ust 6.4 ounces in the women鈥檚 version, and a mere ounce heavier for men鈥攂ut then there鈥檚 that moderately fat heel. The pairing makes it a blistering training shoe, one that can accom颅modate long, pounding runs and mellow days when you want to go easy on your legs. (Be warned, though: the flexy, unstructured midsole can be a little fatiguing on longer efforts.) Overall, the fit of the Kinvara was superior to every other shoe we tested in this category. The updates to this year鈥檚 version are more form than function, and fans of prior editions won鈥檛 notice a big difference. There鈥檚 still plenty to love here. 7.5 oz (men鈥檚) / 6.4 oz (women鈥檚); 4 mm drop
听

New Balance 890v6 ($120)
Best daily driver
The 890v6 is a compromise between a lightweight speed shoe and a go-to trainer. Some testers believed that the combination made it a jack-of-all-runs, while others couldn鈥檛 get past its mastery of none. The shoe is lean, durable, and comfortable鈥攂uilt for up-tempo training, with an excellent fit and buoyant feel. It lacks the spark of the faster shoes we tested, but the 890v6 is better adapted to daily training, given its durability. After logging 80 miles in a pair, one of our testers reported almost no visible wear. Everyone gave the shoe high marks for its lean, perfect last. This is a quick-moving workhorse adept at heavy mileage. 8.9 oz (men鈥檚) / 7.8 oz (women鈥檚); 6 mm drop
听

Brooks Levitate ($150)
Best for cruising
This wasn鈥檛 the most exciting shoe in our test, but it proved its worth as a slow and steady cruiser with even cushioning and a plush ride. Despite its name, the main knock against the Levitate is its portly weight. Every tester dinged it for slow turn颅over. Once you get past that, however, it鈥檚 an enjoyable shoe for long, rambling runs. The fit is on the narrow side, especially in the forefoot, but the lack of overlays around the meta颅tarsal heads means there鈥檚 noth颅ing to rub you raw. And the pillowy padding on the heel collar is a luxurious touch. The upshot: opt for the Levitate if you want an even-tempered, comfort-centric shoe with traditional geometry. 11.2 oz (men鈥檚) / 9.7 oz (women鈥檚); 8 mm drop
听