If you live in the聽U.S., you鈥檝e surely heard an oral history of naughty cyclists. There鈥檚 a widely held perspective that city and suburban streets are overrun with lawbreaking riders鈥攁 swarm of oblivious,聽entitled cyclists rolling red lights, blasting through stop signs, slaloming聽down one-way streets, then (hypocritically!) flipping off drivers.聽
As someone who has driven hundreds of thousands of miles over the past 34 years, and ridden a bike for even longer, my point of view is different.聽Everyone seems to break the rules, whether they鈥檙e on two wheels or four. The big difference is that some do it on an 18-pound bicycle and some do it in a 4,000-pound SUV that can cause exponentially greater harm.聽
But people who don't bike don鈥檛 see it that way鈥攖hey just see people on bikes聽charging through those stop signs. And it鈥檚 nearly impossible to combat their perceptions or even engage in meaningful debate without hard evidence of a different reality. And to聽date, very little research has produced quantifiable data comparing how drivers and cyclists actually behave on the road.
That鈥檚 why 鈥攃ommissioned by the Florida Department of Transportation and conducted by scientists at the University of South Florida鈥檚 Center for Urban Transportation Research鈥攊s so damn interesting. The report, the largest of its kind ever attempted, concluded that cyclists were slightly more compliant with traffic laws than drivers.聽
Conducting what鈥檚 known as a naturalistic behavior study, the聽researchers outfitted the bikes of 100 cyclists with multiple sensors and cameras,聽then recorded data as those participants went about their normal riding lives,聽pedaling聽roughly 2,000 hours in the Tampa Bay metro area. After the test period聽ended, the聽researchers and their grad students scrutinized the video footage and sensor data, tabulating how often cyclists and drivers failed to yield, rolled through stop signs,聽or otherwise broke the rules of the road. They paid聽special attention to instances in which a crash or a close call occurred.聽
In the end, the聽results indicated that cyclists were compliant with the law 88 percent of the time during the day聽and 87 percent of the time after dark. The same study determined that drivers who interacted with the study subjects complied with the law 85 percent of the time. In other words, drivers were slightly naughtier than the cyclists鈥攅ven without measuring speeding or distracted driving.
In a conversation with three of the researchers who conducted the study, I asked if they had any insight into why the findings vary so significantly from public perceptions about scofflaw cyclist behavior. 鈥淢any drivers simply don鈥檛 know the rules that concern people on bikes,鈥 says Cong Chen. 鈥淎bout how much space to give cyclists, for instance, or when riders should get the right of way.鈥
Even more damning, 20 of the 21聽close calls that were聽recorded involved a driver who failed to yield properly while turning,聽or didn鈥檛 give a cyclist the three feet of space mandated by Florida law. 鈥淭he bikes were equipped with proximity sensors,鈥 says research associate聽Achilleas Kourtellis. 鈥淪o we could measure exactly how close the cars got to the cyclists. Some of them were really close calls.鈥 (In the only exception, a cyclist had a near-miss聽after crossing a street while a 鈥淒o Not Walk鈥澛爌edestrian signal was blinking.)聽
鈥淓ven though the cyclists in close calls were almost always compliant with traffic rules, there still were instances where they could have been more cautious,鈥 observes聽Program Director聽Pei-Sung Lin, who led the study. 鈥淚 mean, it鈥檚 obviously not foolproof to assume drivers will follow the rules.鈥澛
There was only one crash during the study period, and that too was caused by a negligent driver. In that case, a motorist rear-ended a cyclist as she waited to make a left turn. In the published study, researchers noted,聽鈥淭he driver was impatient and tried to pass at a relatively high speed since the oncoming traffic was about to stop for the bicyclist to turn.鈥
鈥淏ased on what we saw and measured, we recommend measures that promote separating more than sharing.聽We think creating buffers between cars and bikes is smart.鈥
In another component of the same research project, participants were asked to complete a detailed questionnaire about their cycling behavior. The goal was to examine how cyclists describe their own behavior on the road鈥攈ow and when they might take risks, for instance, and聽what kinds of situations might distract them while they ride.聽
The resulting data was largely unsurprising with one big exception: these self-evaluations revealed that young riders (between the ages of 18 to 25) took more risks and were more frequently distracted than older cyclists. And riders who had completed formal rider-training courses (from the聽organization聽) were even more compliant with regards to traffic laws.聽
Another interesting point: Female cyclists who completed the self-assessment rated themselves as greater risk takers and as more frequently distracted than their male counterparts. The study authors acknowledge that this data is counterintuitive, as numerous studies have documented the higher likelihood of risk-taking behaviors in聽young men, but speculate that women may more honestly聽assess their behavior or attribute more risk to a given action than men.
In any case, based on the study findings, the researchers offered a number of recommendations to help mitigate the frighteningly high rate of close calls. For聽infrastructure improvements, they suggested聽wider and protected bike lanes;聽reflective green markings on bike lanes;聽improved lighting on roadways that see significant bicycle traffic;聽and so-called “through lanes,” which聽reduce conflicts between bicyclists and turning vehicles at intersections by letting riders be safely positioned before cars turn. 鈥淏ased on what we saw and measured, we recommend measures that promote separating more than sharing,鈥 says聽Kourtellis. 鈥淲e think creating buffers between cars and bikes is smart.鈥
It's evident something needs to change to keep riders safe, at聽least in the area where the study took place. The two counties included in the report聽saw聽a total of 1,084 bicycle crashes and 22 fatalities in 2013. And as the study notes, cyclist fatality rates in Florida are three times the national average. According to the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, a total of 7,077 bicycle crashes in 2014 left 135 cyclists dead and another 6,680 injured鈥78 percent more fatalities聽than in 2011.聽
鈥淭here鈥檚 no doubt there鈥檚 a problem with safety here in Florida,鈥 says聽Kourtellis. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 why the DOT asked us to do this study鈥攖o help figure out what we can do to change people鈥檚 behaviors. There are too many people getting hurt.鈥